Alienware is a veteran in gaming systems, and that’s reflected in its R3 version of the Alienware 15. A solid, substantial design packed with midrange components and accented with an ample array of accent lights and backlight zones, it’s basically a tank covered with Christmas lights.
The 15-inch model starts at $1,200, but keep in mind that the lowest-end configurations abut those of the cheaper GTX 1060 at about $1,250 — just without all the bells and whistles — as well as the bigger Alienware 17, which starts at $1,300. You can equip the 15 with up to an overclockable Core i7-7820HK and GeForce GTX 1080 with , 32GB memory and additional storage for $3,850., with a
There are various display options: a basic 1,920×1,080 60Hz IPS 300-nit panel, the same but G-Sync enabled, the same resolution but a TN 400-nit 120Hz G-Sync panel, and a UHD (3,840×2,160) IGZO 300-nit IPS panel. You can also opt for an AMD Radeon RX 570 GPU.
Alienware 15 (R3, 2016)
|Price as reviewed||$2,424.99|
|Display size/resolution||15.6-inch 1,920×1,080 display|
|PC CPU||2.8GHz Intel Core i7-7700HQ|
|PC Memory||16GB DDR SDRAM 2,666Mhz|
|Graphics||8GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070|
|Storage||1 TB HDD+512GB SSD|
|Connectors||1 x Ethernet; 1 x Mini DisplayPort; 1 x HDMI; 2 x USB-C (1 x Thunderbolt/DP); 2 x USB 3 Type-A (1 charging); mic; headphone/audio; dedicated eGPU connection|
|Networking||Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet, Killer Wireless 1535, Bluetooth 4.1|
|Operating system||Windows 10 Home (64-bit)|
4K on this system is probably overkill, especially since you’re sacrificing refresh rate and G-Sync compatibility to get it. For gaming, 1,920×1,080 on a screen this small suffices, and you don’t have the performance penalties of the higher resolution. Pixel density is relatively high at about 141ppi (a pixel pitch of 0.18), so it’s fine for non-gaming activities — you know, like work — as well. You can always attach a big, high-resolution display to it, and if you do it via the Mini DisplayPort, you’ll get G-Sync support. Plus, the battery life isn’t great with this low-power panel: Imagine what 4K would do to that.
Our test system came with the TN+WVA display, which turns out to be a pretty nice compromise if you want speed and don’t care about color accuracy. In this case “WVA” stands for “wide viewing angle,” not to be confused with VA (Vertical Alignment) panels. Viewing angle is better than a cheap TN panel, but I still wouldn’t call it “wide.”
Its color gamut measures 93 percent of sRGB, which puts it between the lower-end TN panels and IPS, and hits a peak luminance of about 420 nits — typical is closer to about 315 nits. There’s little ghosting, and at 120Hz games run quite smoothly. If you want better color you can always connect it to an external monitor; I had no trouble running anoff the Mini DisplayPort at 144Hz with G-Sync. You can connect a display via USB-C/Thunderbolt, but that’s not on the GPU bus; it can only run off the Intel HD 630 integrated graphics, so no G-Sync.
Looks aren’t everything
Without the lighting effects it’s an almost old-fashioned looking system, and feels really solid — it should at almost 8 pounds/3.5Kg, and that’s without the heavy-enough-to-weaponize power brick.